Prioritization of Resilience Initiatives for Climate-Related Disasters in the Metropolitan City of Venice. in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis / Risk Anal. 2022 May;42(5):931-952. doi: 10.1111/risa.13823. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2022
ARPA Piemonte
ARPA Piemonte
Tipo pubblicazione
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Autori/Collaboratori (8)Vedi tutti...
Torresan S
University of Ca' Foscari, Via Torino 155, Venezia Mestre, 30170, Italy.
Marcomini A
Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Building 1, Barrio Sarriena 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
Critto A
Fondazione Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (Fondazione CMCC), c/via Augusto Imperatore 16, Lecce, 73100, Italy.
et alii...
University of Ca' Foscari, Via Torino 155, Venezia Mestre, 30170, Italy.
Marcomini A
Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Building 1, Barrio Sarriena 48940, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
Critto A
Fondazione Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (Fondazione CMCC), c/via Augusto Imperatore 16, Lecce, 73100, Italy.
et alii...
Abstract
Increases in the magnitude and frequency of climate and other disruptive factors are placing environmental, economic, and social stresses on coastal systems. This is further exacerbated by land use transformations, urbanization, over-tourism, sociopolitical tensions, technological innovations, among others. A scenario-informed multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) was applied in the Metropolitan City of Venice integrating qualitative (i.e., local stakeholder preferences) and quantitative information (i.e., climate-change projections) with the aim of enhancing system resilience to multiple climate-related threats. As part of this analysis, different groups of local stakeholders (e.g., local authorities, civil protection agencies, SMEs, NGOs) were asked to identify critical functions that needs to be sustained. Various policy initiatives were considered to support these critical functions. The MCDA was used to rank the initiatives across several scenarios describing main climate threats (e.g., storm surges, floods, heatwaves, drought). We found that many climate change scenarios were considered to be disruptive to stakeholders and influence alternative ranking. The management alternatives acting on physical domain generally enhance resilience across just a few scenarios while cognitive and informative initiatives provided resilience enhancement across most scenarios considered. With uncertainty of multiple stressors along with projected climate variability, a portfolio of cognitive and physical initiatives is recommended to enhance resilience.
Accesso banca dati bibliografica
Accedi alla scheda bibliografica del documento in PUBMED
Se sei accreditato in BVS-P effettua prima l'accesso per utilizzare i nostri servizi.
PMID : 34533220
DOI : 10.1111/risa.13823
Keywords
scenario-based preferences; risk management; critical functions; Venice; Climate change; Uncertainty; Floods; Disasters; Climate Change; Cities; systems engineering; uncertainty analysis;