Clinical evaluation of a deep learning CBCT auto-segmentation software for prostate adaptive radiation therapy. in Clinical and translational radiation oncology / Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 18;47:100796. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100796. eCollection 2024 J

2024
ASL Torino 4

Tipo pubblicazione

Journal Article

Autori/Collaboratori (11)Vedi tutti...

Radici L
Medical Physics Department, ASL TO4 Ivrea, Italy.
Piva C
Radiotherapy Department, ASL TO4 Ivrea, Italy.
Casanova Borca V
Medical Physics Department, ASL TO4 Ivrea, Italy.

et alii...

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aim of the present study is to characterize a deep learning-based auto-segmentation software (DL) for prostate cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and to evaluate its applicability in clinical adaptive radiation therapy routine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients, who received exclusive radiation therapy with definitive intent on the prostate gland and seminal vesicles, were selected. Femoral heads, bladder, rectum, prostate, and seminal vesicles were retrospectively contoured by four different expert radiation oncologists on patients CBCT, acquired during treatment. Consensus contours (CC) were generated starting from these data and compared with those created by DL with different algorithms, trained on CBCT (DL-CBCT) or computed tomography (DL-CT). Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), centre of mass (COM) shift and volume relative variation (VRV) were chosen as comparison metrics. Since no tolerance limit can be defined, results were also compared with the inter-operator variability (IOV), using the same metrics. RESULTS: The best agreement between DL and CC was observed for femoral heads (DSC of 0.96 for both DL-CBCT and DL-CT). Performance worsened for low-contrast soft tissue organs: the worst results were found for seminal vesicles (DSC of 0.70 and 0.59 for DL-CBCT and DL-CT, respectively). The analysis shows that it is appropriate to use algorithms trained on the specific imaging modality. Furthermore, the statistical analysis showed that, for almost all considered structures, there is no significant difference between DL-CBCT and human operator in terms of IOV. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of DL-CBCT is in accordance with CC; its use in clinical practice is justified by the comparison with the inter-operator variability.

Accesso banca dati bibliografica

PMID : 38884004

DOI : 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100796

Keywords

Adaptive Radiotherapy; Auto-segmentation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Deep Learning; Prostate Cancer;